Can deforestation be halted in the Congo?
The Congo Basin has become a familiar setting for large pledges and thin follow-through. It is home to the world’s second-largest tropical rainforest, spans several Central African countries, and underpins the livelihoods of tens of millions of people. It is also chronically underfunded, politically fragmented, and increasingly exposed to mining, small-scale agriculture, and energy scarcity. A $2.5 billion pledge announced last November at the COP30 climate conference aims to change that pattern. Whether it does will depend on how it is implemented.
The pledge, known as the Belém Call to Action for the Congo Basin Forests, was the focus of a recent Land Dialogues webinar that brought together policymakers, civil-society leaders, and donor representatives. For several participants, it was their first public discussion of how the money might move from paper commitments to practical interventions, reports Latoya Abulu.
Much of the debate centered on land tenure and direct access to finance for Indigenous peoples and local communities. Joseph Itongwa, a regional Indigenous leader, argued that conservation outcomes depend on whether those who live in forests can secure rights and livelihoods.
“There is an interdependence between biological diversity and cultural diversity,” he said, adding that Indigenous peoples already play a central role in maintaining forest ecosystems. The problem, he noted, is not a lack of capacity but a lack of access: bureaucratic barriers and donor priorities often prevent communities from receiving funds directly.
Others echoed that concern. Simon Hopkins of the Central African Forest Initiative said that “more funding must be directed to protecting standing forests,” and that traditional aid budgets, largely from the Global North, are unlikely to be sufficient. Expanding the pool of contributors to include multilateral institutions and nontraditional sovereign funders will be necessary if the pledge is to scale.
Implementation risks loom large. Civil-society representatives warned that past commitments have stalled because of opaque financing, weak coordination, and fragile regional institutions. Clear governance structures and traceable funding channels, they argued, are essential if the call to action is not to join a long list of unmet promises.
The urgency is clear. According to Global Forest Watch, the Democratic Republic of Congo lost 590,000 hectares of forest in 2024, the highest level on record. The question now is whether the Belém pledge can move faster than the forces driving that loss.
























